In the midst of the "new atheist" attack on the value of religion as a public good, British philosopher Roger Scruton took part in a discussion regarding that topic over at the UK Independent online.
Scruton defended religion as a force for good in society:
The rituals of religion are shared and those who participate in them are
drawn into another kind of relationship with their neighbours than
those that prevail in the world of "getting and spending". People hunger
for this kind of membership and the power of religion resides in its
ability to provide it. In the rituals of a religion all worldly
differences are overcome: the Sultan bows in submission beside his
subjects and the good-natured fool takes communion beside the crook who
cheated him. The ritual shines on both of them from a place beyond their
ordinary experience and includes them in a community whose home is in
some way not of this world. And in the Christian case the ritual records
a primeval sacrifice, born of love.
In addition to its ability to provide consolation and to help people deal with "metaphysical loneliness," Scruton contents that religion also can be an incubator of fundamental virtues like humility and justice, as well as reinforce the principle of human equality:
[Religion] contains idiocy, prejudice, ignorance and stupidity in all the
proportions that these are displayed by mankind as a whole. But that is
its great virtue: it can draw people, whatever their talents and
intellectual powers, into a shared apprehension of their condition. It
can teach humility and justice, and remind the one with power,
knowledge, wealth or artistic talent, that he is the equal of the one
beside him in the moment of worship, however ignorant, weak or sinful
that person might be. And to both of them it offers hope.
I would add one point to Scruton's argument -- that religion can serve as a counterweight to both radical individualism and overwhelming state power. Religion at its best calls human beings beyond themselves to care for others and to be concerned not with their own wants and desires, but with transcendent moral truth. For the same reason, religion can serve as a balance against the power of the state -- when the state demands immoral action, religion can provide the intellectual framework and moral tradition to thwart tyranny. Martin Luther King, Jr., Oscar Romero,
Franz Jäggerstatter, Lech Walesa, and others too numerous to mention testify to this fact. This point is so strong that even Christopher Hitchens has acknowledged it.
2 comments:
thank you for the intro to Peter Hitchens...
Carol-CS
More than welcome! Peter Hitchens is a real delight, a great op-ed writer -- and wiser than his more famous brother. Cheers!
Post a Comment