Second, the conservative adheres to custom, convention, and continuity. It is old custom that enables people to live together peaceably; the destroyers of custom demolish more than they know or desire. It is through convention—a word much abused in our time—that we contrive to avoid perpetual disputes about rights and duties: law at base is a body of conventions. Continuity is the means of linking generation to generation; it matters as much for society as it does for the individual; without it, life is meaningless. When successful revolutionaries have effaced old customs, derided old conventions, and broken the continuity of social institutions—why, presently they discover the necessity of establishing fresh customs, conventions, and continuity; but that process is painful and slow; and the new social order that eventually emerges may be much inferior to the old order that radicals overthrew in their zeal for the Earthly Paradise. Conservatives are champions of custom, convention, and continuity because they prefer the devil they know to the devil they don’t know. Order and justice and freedom, they believe, are the artificial products of a long social experience, the result of centuries of trial and reflection and sacrifice. Thus the body social is a kind of spiritual corporation, comparable to the church; it may even be called a community of souls. Human society is no machine, to be treated mechanically. The continuity, the life-blood, of a society must not be interrupted. Burke’s reminder of the necessity for prudent change is in the mind of the conservative. But necessary change, conservatives argue, ought to he gradual and discriminatory, never unfixing old interests at once.--Russell Kirk, Ten Conservative Principles (1993).
Welcome! Formerly known as Libertas et Memoria, this is my blog on law, politics, faith, culture and the joys of the Inland Northwest.
Friday, October 3, 2008
The Second Conservative Principle: "Human society is no machine"
Labels:
ideas,
jurisprudence,
politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I'll tell you what I think is important about this insight from Kirk. It is an important corrective to the social scientific view that man is strictly conditioned and can be manipulated (like a machine) by the right forms of conditioning and institutionalization. Of course, the social sciences are woefully inadequate and unable to achieve what they aspire to achieve precisely because man has freedom. I'm not saying that there is absolutely no use or truth in the social sciences, but what is more fundamental is the organic relationship that human beings have with each other that is handed down by custom and tradition and it is also essential to realize that no matter how much one may be molded, one is still always free.
Well put.
Social science can never be a science because human beings, unlike purely material agents like atoms and the like, have free will.
Post a Comment